INTRODUCTION
The Corbett Tiger Reserve in Uttarakhand, India, is home to a majestic array of wildlife, including the endangered Bengal tiger. Camera traps have been installed throughout the reserve to conserve and protect this precious ecosystem. These cameras are designed to track and monitor wildlife movements, providing valuable insights for conservation efforts.
However, a recent study by Cambridge has revealed a disturbing trend. Camera traps in the Corbett Tiger Reserve are being used to spy on and harass women living in nearby villages. This shocking finding has sparked widespread concern about the impact of surveillance on marginalized communities. The study’s authors argue that the use of camera traps in this way is a clear infringement on women’s safety and privacy rights.
As the Indian government grapples with the challenges of conservation and development, the issue of camera traps in tiger reserves has become a pressing concern. This article will explore the unintended consequences of camera traps in Corbett Tiger Reserve, and examine the implications for women’s rights, conservation efforts, and the future of India’s protected areas.
PATRIARCHAL GAZE: IMPACT ON WOMEN’S SAFETY AND PRIVACY
The deployment of camera traps in India’s tiger reserves has effectively extended the patriarchal gaze into the most intimate and personal spaces of women’s lives. The camera traps, which are often installed without the consent or knowledge of local communities, have created a culture of surveillance that undermines women’s safety and privacy.
The Cambridge report notes that the camera traps have been used to monitor women’s movements and activities, often with the explicit goal of controlling their behavior. Women who venture into the forest to collect firewood, herbs, or other essential resources are often tracked and monitored by forest officials, who use the camera trap footage to regulate their movements.
This patriarchal gaze has a profound impact on women’s safety and privacy. Women who are aware that they are being watched and monitored often feel anxious and fearful, and may alter their behavior to avoid being seen. This can seriously affect women’s livelihoods and well-being, as they may be forced to abandon essential activities such as collecting firewood or herbs.
Furthermore, the camera traps have also enabled a form of “technological patriarchy,” where women’s bodies and movements are subject to constant scrutiny and control. This has reinforced existing power dynamics, where men can exert control over women’s lives and movements.
The lack of accountability and transparency in the deployment and use of camera traps further exacerbates the impact of the patriarchal gaze on women’s safety and privacy. Women who have been affected by the camera traps often have little recourse to seek justice or redress and may be forced to suffer in silence.
FOREST RANGERS’ ABUSE OF POWER
The misuse of power by forest rangers has severely compromised women’s safety. Forest rangers, who are in positions meant to manage and protect the forest, have exploited their authority, directly threatening women’s safety and well-being. The camera traps, initially designed to monitor wildlife, have been inappropriately repurposed to surveil women’s movements and activities, placing their safety in jeopardy.
The findings of the Cambridge report reveal alarming instances where forest rangers have used footage from these camera traps to blackmail and coerce women, further undermining women’s safety. Women affected by these abuses report profound feelings of fear and anxiety, significantly impacting their overall safety and sense of security. They feel powerless, illustrating how the actions of forest rangers threaten women’s safety on multiple levels.
Furthermore, the report highlights that forest rangers have been intruding into women’s personal lives by monitoring their relationships and family dynamics. This invasive scrutiny contributes to a culture of surveillance that endangers women’s safety. Living under constant observation from rangers makes many women feel perpetually on edge, compromising their emotional and physical safety.
The troubling abuse of power by forest rangers continues largely due to a worrying lack of accountability and transparency surrounding their actions. Women who have experienced these violations of their rights often find their concerns dismissed, which only exacerbates the risks to their safety and well-being. The barriers they face in seeking justice highlight the crucial need for systems that prioritize women’s safety.
The report’s findings underscore the urgent need for heightened accountability and transparency in the actions of forest rangers, with a specific emphasis on ensuring women’s safety. It is vital to implement stronger mechanisms designed to prevent the abuse of power and to strongly advocate for women’s safety at all levels. Women’s rights and dignity must be at the forefront, with a deliberate focus on protecting and prioritizing women’s safety to foster a secure and just environment.
WOMEN’S EXPERIENCES
Women living in and around the forests of Uttarakhand have shared their personal experiences regarding the impact of camera traps on their lives, particularly concerning women’s safety. Many have expressed feelings of anxiety and fear when entering the forest, aware that their movements are being tracked and monitored.
A study published in the journal Environment and Planning F revealed troubling practices by forest rangers, who intentionally flew drones over local women to intimidate them and prevent them from collecting natural resources—resources they are legally entitled to gather. Researchers from the University of Cambridge conducted interviews with 270 residents around the Corbett Tiger Reserve in Uttarakhand over 14 months.
The authors of the study argued that the implementation of digital technologies for forest governance, such as camera traps and drones, tends to masculinize these forest spaces, extending society’s patriarchal gaze into the wilderness and threatening women’s safety. Researcher and lead author Trishant Simlai reported that the women, who had once found solace in the forests away from their men-dominated villages, now felt observed and constrained by the presence of camera traps. This heightened surveillance led them to talk and sing much more quietly, further compromising their sense of security.
One woman, wishing to remain anonymous, recounted her experience of being harassed by forest rangers who had access to camera trap footage. “They would often call me and ask me to come to the forest department office,” she shared. “They would show me pictures of myself and ask me what I was doing in the forest. It was very humiliating and frightening for my women’s safety.”
Another woman explained how these camera traps adversely affected her ability to collect essential resources like firewood. “I used to go to the forest every day to collect firewood,” she said. “But now I’m afraid to go because I know I’m being watched. This impacts my family’s livelihood and puts our women’s safety at risk since we don’t have enough firewood for cooking and heating.”
Moreover, the camera traps have been used to scrutinize women’s personal lives, including their relationships and family dynamics, perpetuating a culture of surveillance and control that undermines women’s safety. As one woman noted, “The absence of consent in deploying these cameras is also a glaring issue that the government must address.” This sentiment resonates with many who feel their rights and autonomy are being compromised by the surveillance measures.
Despite the challenges posed by these camera traps, some women have found ways to resist and subvert this intrusive monitoring for the sake of their safety. One woman reported using a camera trap to document evidence of domestic violence. “I would lead my husband in front of the camera trap, which allowed me to collect proof of the abuse and seek help,” she said. This act of resistance underscores the resourcefulness and resilience of women in the face of adversity, highlighting their commitment to reclaiming their safety and autonomy.
THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF CONSERVATION TECHNOLOGIES
The deployment of camera traps in India’s tiger reserves is a stark example of how conservation technologies can have unintended consequences that undermine the very goals they are intended to achieve. While camera traps were intended to monitor wildlife and prevent poaching, they have instead become a tool of surveillance and control over women’s lives.
The Cambridge report notes that the use of camera traps has created a “culture of surveillance” in which women are constantly monitored and tracked. This has led to a range of unintended consequences, including the erosion of women’s autonomy and mobility, the reinforcement of patriarchal attitudes and behaviors, and the exacerbation of existing social and economic inequalities.
Furthermore, the report highlights how conservation technologies can perpetuate and reinforce existing power dynamics, particularly those related to gender. The use of camera traps, for example, has enabled forest officials to exert greater control over women’s lives and movements, reinforcing patriarchal attitudes and behaviors.
The unintended consequences of conservation technologies also extend to women’s safety and well-being. The Cambridge report notes that the use of camera traps has led to an increase in reports of harassment and violence against women, as well as a decline in the overall sense of women’s safety and security.
Ultimately, the unintended consequences of conservation technologies highlight the need for a more nuanced and inclusive approach to conservation, one that takes into account the needs and rights of local communities, particularly women. Conservation efforts can be more effective, equitable, and sustainable by prioritizing women’s safety, autonomy, and well-being.
THE WAY FORWARD: BALANCING CONSERVATION AND WOMEN’S RIGHTS
As the Cambridge report highlights, the deployment of camera traps in India’s tiger reserves has raised important questions about the balance between conservation and women’s safety. While conservation efforts are crucial for protecting endangered species and their habitats, they must not come at the cost of women’s safety and well-being.
So, what is the way forward? How can conservation efforts be balanced with the need to protect women’s safety and autonomy? Here are a few possible solutions:
- Community-led conservation: Conservation efforts should be led by local communities, including women, who deeply understand the forest’s ecosystem and the needs of local wildlife. This approach would ensure that conservation efforts are tailored to the specific needs of the community and the environment.
- Inclusive decision-making: Women should be included in decision-making processes related to conservation efforts, including the deployment of camera traps. This would ensure that women’s concerns and needs are taken into account and that conservation efforts do not inadvertently harm women.
- Alternative technologies: Alternative technologies, such as sensor-based monitoring systems, could be used to monitor wildlife populations without compromising women’s safety and autonomy.
- Sensitization and training: Forest officials and conservationists should receive sensitization and training on the importance of women’s safety and autonomy, as well as the potential impacts of conservation technologies on women’s lives.
- Accountability and redress: Mechanisms should be put in place to ensure accountability and redress for women who have been affected by conservation efforts, including the deployment of camera traps
CONCLUSION
The deployment of camera traps in India’s tiger reserves has highlighted the complex and often fraught relationship between conservation efforts and women’s safety. While conservation technologies can be a powerful tool for protecting endangered species and their habitats, they must be used in a way that respects and prioritizes the rights and dignity of local communities, particularly women.
The experiences of women living in and around the forests of Uttarakhand are a stark reminder of the need for a more nuanced and inclusive approach to conservation. By listening to women’s voices and concerns and prioritizing their safety and autonomy, conservation efforts can be more effective, equitable, and sustainable.
Ultimately, the conservation of India’s tiger reserves must be a collaborative effort that involves local communities, conservationists, and policymakers. By working together, we can find solutions that balance the need to protect endangered species with respect and protect women’s rights and dignity. Can we truly say that conservation is a positive force for both people and the planet?
-SHEELU KUMARI
MUST READ: PIONEERING PROTECTION: AUSTRALIA UNVEILS NATIONWIDE SOCIAL MEDIA BAN UNDER 16’S
